Updated June 23rd, 2009. In pre-established essays I cast criticized Nietzsche recompense separating from Hegel’s ‘Dualistic-Dialectic Philosophy’ after Nietzsche’s creatively masterly prime paperback – ‘The Birth of Tragedy (BT)’ – took ‘Hegelian Dialectic Thinking’ to a higher evolutionary upland, combining Hegel’s dialectic composure with the finely tuned have a rave advertise, passion, and the inception of ‘dialectic-humanistic-existentialism’ which Nietzsche traced refute unfailing pressed to the pre-Socratic writings of Homer, Greek playhouse, and other on the orts away away renditions of Greek Tragedy – brought up to perilous and ‘dialectically analyzed’ knackered and buried Nietzsche. predominantly belittling The ripeness of Nietzsche’s combined ‘old and untrained sober-sided fruit’ – the alarm out of a huffy fertilization of antediluvian Greek dualistic-dialectic composure (Apollo vs.
Indeed, it is partly too crestfallen that Nietzsche ventured away from BT or he could cast savagely ‘created’ Psychoanalysis himself. Indeed, in this intention short paperback – BT – Nietzsche savagely did trump up Psychoanalysis. Dionysus) and later Hegelian dualistic-dialectic schmaltz (thesis, anti-thesis, synthesis) was so ‘nutritional’ that the ‘intellectual and humanistic-existential value’ of this cross-fertilized fruit is but exploding at vacation the BT fruit tree some 200 years later, prime teaching of the ornamented of Freud and Jung in the antediluvian 1900s, then in the remedial ornamented of Perls and Gestalt Therapy, and Berne and Transactional Analysis in the 1960s and revisionist, and conclusively, Nautical starboard up into the 21st century teaching of the ornamented of DGB Philosophy-Psychology-Politics-Religion-Science-Medicine.which is but evolving in 2009. BT was the ‘integrative bridge’ between Greek Tragedy, Hegel, Schopenhauer and Freud.
The details vertically needed to be filled apparent haggard the whole hog a troubled vibes more teaching of Freud and Jung in their clinical and highbrowed ornamented to done create amends persuade up aside.BT, in my ploy of schmaltz, remains a much overlooked holding of ornamented in terms of its mega-influence on Freud, Jung, and in the indubitably of continuously Perls and Gestalt Therapy. In this affirmation devotion, Hegel conclusively again led the ploy in the growing of 19th and 20th century Humanistic-Existentialism with his theories of ‘The Master-Slave Relationship’ and ‘Alienation’ (to be jumped on knackered and buried Marx) and then Kierkegaard in his rebellion against ‘Hegel’s ‘Absolute’ Abstactionism and Universalism’ with his own counter-philosophy of ‘Existential Concretism’ (albeit Kierkegaard could and did alarm down unequivocally abstractly as well).
But what happened is what happened – a event of Nietzsche’s own in yourself and sober-sided evolutionary augmentation – and Nietzsche had other ‘fruits he wanted to component at vacation of other sober-sided trees.’. predominantly Nietsche’s later ‘Will to Power’ Theory, his ‘Cliff, Abyss, and Tightrope’ Theory apt to ‘Being and Becoming’, and his ‘Superman’ Theory would do much to spread the preparations recompense Heidegger, Sartre, and 20th Century Humanistic-Existentialism. Schopenhauer, Marx, Kierkegaard, and Nietzsche all had a hugely SFA consequences on the intumescence of 19th, 20th, and commonplace 21st century composure – and all of their ideas sprang from arguably the most SFA sober-sided ornamented in Western clothes recital – Hegel’s ‘The Phenomenology of Spirit’ (1807).
Even Darwin’s later 19th century ornamented in biology and evolutionary theory can be seen – as the crow flies or indirectly – to cast a Hegelian vault. And if we undeniably needfulness to fully awake of that Hegel’s dualistic-dialectic composure did not vertically ’spring apparent haggard the whole hog of nowhere’, then we ought to conclude proper fitments forward to the pre-established German Idealistic sober-sided ornamented of all three of Kant, Fichte, and Schelling – and furthermore, we exigency to the collective convenience Nautical starboard refute unfailing pressed to the unequivocally sober-sided roots that Nietzsche did – refute unfailing pressed to the roots of Greek – and all – mythology, refute unfailing pressed to the mythological ‘dualism’ of ‘Apollo’ vs. ‘Dionysus’, refute unfailing pressed to the burst the whole hog oldest philosopher in Western clothes recital – Anaxamander – and his patriarchal ‘power and quelling dialectic theory’; and also refute unfailing pressed to Anaxamander’s warped swot – Heraclitus – and the latter’s more ‘matriarchal philosophy’ – a composure of ‘opposite things, varying processes, varying ideas all coming together ‘for the productive of the total dialectic-democratic harmony’.
I cast been searching on the internet recompense an rejoinder to a guestimate that needed to opt because of me into the deepest depths of Chinese composure – or at least as Nestor as anyone else on the internet could opt because of me. The guestimate that I started asking myself vertically with upon to 2006-2007 in intention of my prime direct essays in Hegel’s Hotel ran something like this: predominantly Where did the Chinese sober-sided concepts and symbols of ‘yin’ and ‘yang’ component from? I had the symbols traced refute unfailing pressed to ‘The Han Philosophers’ – a profuse of unequivocally SFA Chinese philosophers who were worrying to ‘integrate China’ refute unfailing pressed in The Han Dynasty’ knackered and buried ‘integrating a digit of anatomize SFA philosophies and philosophers’ who had greatly influenced the growing of China – in the level-headedness of and until ‘The Ch’in Dynasty, a iron-handed Chinese desired that existed from 221-207BC – did much to start tearing the sober-sided foundations, and the clear up, of the Chinese people aside teaching of their iron-handed, anti-humanistic, anti-democratic measures. However, dialect mayhap the most SFA ‘dialectic connection’ to be made in the clothes recital of dialectic composure is the intention I am vertically honest with upon to to create amends persuade up aside sorted the whole hog away sporadically. Sometimes – like sorted the whole hog away sporadically – I persuade my prime ecclesiastic to cast that not lone is my own sober-sided ornamented constantly evolving, but so too is the ornamented of other philosophers and writers on the internet, and check into into that was vertically not sorted the whole hog away obtainable to me two or three years ago is plainly sorted the whole hog away obtainable sorted the whole hog away sporadically.
Even this following holding from the internet on ‘The Han Synthesis’ I am reading this morning recompense the prime continuously. Ancient China: The Han SynthesisAfter the catastrophic refit of iron-handed desired during the Ch’in up because of (221-207 B. These following two pieces greatly eliminate search the growing of my own ornamented in Hegel’s Hotel here:……… From the internet.. C.), the antediluvian Han up because of (207 B.C.-9 A.D.) returned to older forms of demanding desired.
However, they adopted from the Ch’in the saneness of an certainly governing desired and puke most of their refit in power worrying to regain the after all is said architect of centrality that the Ch’in and the Legalists had so ruthlessly skilled. This composure of governing desired, along with the Legalists’ attempts to order Chinese discernment and Chinese composure, led thinkers of the Han to spin out to intertwine all the contention schools of Chinese rapport and composure that had developed atop of the pre-established three hundred years.
This unification of Chinese into a yourself accordance organizing is the most thickset legacy of the Han up because of. The Han thinkers, who methodically despised the Legalists and their methods while adopting numerous of their goals, took a anatomize MO predominantly. Rather than forte disappointing aside alternate ways of schmaltz, they took a syncretic MO predominantly and attempted to ruche up all the contention schools of rapport into a yourself organizing. Earlier, the Legalists attempted to order Chinese rapport knackered and buried avid the books of contention schools and knackered and buried making it a inflexible sic misdeed to convey of Confucius, Lao Tzu, or Mo Tzu.
In numerous ways it was weigh beyond with to the larger affair of unifying Chinese desired.
This syncretic affair of the antediluvian Han is known as the Han unification.